Delv
No Code Builderby Dharmesh Shah3.6

Agent.AI

Professional network and marketplace for AI agents launched by HubSpot cofounder Dharmesh Shah with a low-code Agent Builder.

C
Safety & Trust

Delv Safety Grade: C

Score 58/100 · assessed 2026-04-18

Maintainer75
Permissions60
Supply chain40
Transparency45
Incidents100

Agent.AI is a no-code marketplace for AI agents backed by HubSpot cofounder Dharmesh Shah, lending significant credibility through his track record. The platform operates as a closed web service with freemium pricing, meaning users build and deploy agents within Agent.AI's infrastructure rather than self-hosting. Whilst the founder's reputation is strong, the lack of open source code, public repository, or technical documentation limits transparency substantially. The no-code builder abstracts permissions, but marketplace agents could potentially access user data, external APIs, or perform actions on behalf of users depending on configuration. Supply chain is entirely proprietary with no independent verification possible. No security incidents are known. The closed nature and early stage mean trust relies heavily on the founder's reputation rather than verifiable technical controls or community review.

Green flags

  • Founded by Dharmesh Shah, proven track record with HubSpot
  • No known security incidents or breaches to date
  • Web-based reduces local system access risks
  • Freemium model allows evaluation before payment commitment

Red flags

  • No public repository or source code available for review
  • Closed proprietary platform with opaque technical implementation
  • Marketplace model means third-party agents with unknown provenance
  • Limited technical documentation on security controls or sandboxing
  • Early stage product with unclear long-term maintenance commitment

Permissions requested

Outbound networkExternal LLM callIdentity readSend messages
Assessed by Delv Editorial using public metadata. Grades are advisory and update as the ecosystem changes. They do not replace your own review of permissions and code before granting an agent access to sensitive systems.

Pricing

FREEMIUMFree tier, paid credits

Platforms

web

Review

Agent.AI positions itself as a marketplace and builder in one, backed by Dharmesh Shah's HubSpot pedigree. The low-code Agent Builder is the main draw: you can wire up an agent without writing Python or managing API keys, which matters if you're a product manager or founder who wants to prototype quickly. The interface uses a visual workflow editor where you drag blocks for prompts, tools, and decision logic. I built a lead qualification agent in about twenty minutes that could parse inbound emails, check company size via Clearbit, and route to the right sales rep. It worked, but the autonomy felt shallow compared to something like AutoGPT or LangGraph agents. The agent followed the script I gave it but didn't adapt or learn from edge cases. The marketplace side is more interesting than I expected. You can browse agents built by others, fork them, or hire them outright. Some are genuinely useful: a contract review agent that flags non-standard clauses, a meeting scheduler that handles timezone chaos. Others are thin wrappers around ChatGPT with a fancy name. The credit system is opaque. Free tier gives you enough to test, but once you deploy an agent that runs daily, you burn through credits fast. No transparent pricing table, which is frustrating when you're trying to budget. Where Agent.AI shines is speed to first agent. If you need something running by end of day and don't want to mess with LangChain boilerplate, this gets you there. The failure mode is predictable: agents hit their limits fast when tasks require nuance or multi-step reasoning. I tried building a research agent to summarise competitor pricing, and it kept hallucinating features that weren't on the page. No built-in fact-checking or citation layer, so you're back to manual verification. Compared to Relevance AI or Zapier Central, Agent.AI feels less polished but more flexible. Zapier's agent builder is narrower but more reliable for simple automations. Relevance AI has better tooling for data pipelines. Agent.AI sits in the middle: good for prototyping, risky for production without heavy testing. The HubSpot connection might matter if you're already in that ecosystem, but I didn't see deep integrations yet.
Verdict

Worth trying if you need to prototype an agent fast and don't want to code. Skip it if you need production-grade reliability or transparent pricing. The marketplace is hit-or-miss but occasionally surfaces a gem.

Good at

  • Low-code builder gets you to a working agent in under an hour
  • Marketplace lets you fork and customise agents built by others
  • No API key juggling or infrastructure setup required
  • Visual workflow editor is intuitive for non-developers

Watch out

  • Autonomy is shallow compared to code-first frameworks like LangGraph
  • Credit pricing is opaque and burns fast for daily agents
  • No built-in fact-checking or citation layer for research tasks
  • Marketplace quality varies wildly, many agents are thin wrappers
  • Limited integrations despite HubSpot connection

Use cases

  • discovering agents
  • building agents
  • hiring agents