Legora
European legal AI workspace (formerly Leya) with agentic research, tabular review and a Word add-in for firms across 15+ jurisdictions.
Delv Safety Grade: C
Score 58/100 · assessed 2026-04-19
Legora (formerly Leya) is an enterprise legal AI workspace targeting European law firms across 15+ jurisdictions. The maintainer appears to be a legitimate commercial entity serving professional legal clients, which provides some organisational credibility. However, the complete absence of a public repository, technical documentation, or transparent supply chain creates significant opacity. As an autonomous agent with broad legal research capabilities, it requires access to sensitive legal databases, likely needs to read firm documents, and may execute complex multi-step research workflows without clear permission boundaries. The enterprise-only pricing and closed-source nature mean independent security review is impossible. No public incidents are known, but the lack of transparency around data handling, API integrations, and autonomy guardrails makes this a trust-based relationship rather than a verifiable one. Suitable only for firms with robust vendor due diligence processes and clear data governance agreements.
Green flags
- Targets regulated legal sector with professional client base
- Enterprise pricing suggests formal contracts and SLAs
- Rebrand from Leya indicates ongoing business investment
- Multi-jurisdiction focus suggests sophisticated legal data partnerships
Red flags
- No public repository or technical documentation available
- Closed-source autonomous agent with opaque decision-making logic
- Unclear data retention and cross-jurisdiction handling policies
- No visible security certifications or compliance documentation
- Autonomous research across 15+ legal databases raises data leakage risk
Permissions requested
Pricing
Platforms
Review
If you're a European law firm doing cross-border work, Legora is the best research agent on the market. UK-only practices or solo practitioners will find better value elsewhere, and US firms should look at Harvey or Casetext instead.
Good at
- Genuine multi-jurisdictional coverage across 15+ European legal systems
- Tabular review extracts and compares contract clauses at scale
- Word add-in integrates into existing associate workflows
- Agentic research that synthesises findings, not just retrieval
- Strong on German and Nordic law where competitors are thin
Watch out
- Enterprise pricing puts it out of reach for solo practitioners and boutiques
- Occasional misses on pre-digital or poorly structured case law
- Overkill if you only work in one or two jurisdictions
- Requires legal expertise to catch when the agent overreaches
- No public pricing transparency, contact sales only
Use cases
- due diligence
- document review
- legal drafting