Otter.ai
AI meeting agent (OtterPilot) that joins calls, transcribes in real time, generates summaries and drafts follow-up emails.
Delv Safety Grade: B
Score 71/100 · assessed 2026-04-18
Otter.ai is a well-established commercial service from a funded company (raised $63M+) operating since 2016. The autonomous agent joins video calls, records audio, and processes conversations through their cloud infrastructure. Trust stems from their business reputation and enterprise customer base rather than open-source transparency. The service requires broad permissions: microphone access, calendar integration to auto-join meetings, network access to upload recordings, and ability to send emails on your behalf. No public repository means supply chain cannot be independently verified. The closed-source model and cloud processing of potentially sensitive meeting content are inherent risks. However, they maintain SOC 2 Type II compliance and serve major enterprises, suggesting operational maturity. No known security incidents, but users must trust Otter.ai's data handling practices completely.
Green flags
- Established company since 2016 with $63M+ funding and enterprise clients
- SOC 2 Type II certified, indicating security audit compliance
- No known security incidents or data breaches in public record
- Clear business model (freemium SaaS) reduces incentive for data misuse
- Widely used by Fortune 500 companies, suggesting operational trust
Red flags
- Closed source with no public code review possible
- Processes all meeting audio and transcripts in their cloud infrastructure
- Auto-joins meetings via calendar access, potential for unintended recordings
- Can send emails on user's behalf without per-message approval
- No repository means supply chain is completely opaque
Permissions requested
Pricing
Platforms
Review
If you spend more than five hours a week in meetings, the paid tier is worth it. If you're mostly in one-on-ones or highly technical discussions with jargon, the free tier will show you its limits quickly.
Good at
- Joins meetings autonomously, no manual recording needed
- Real-time transcription accurate enough to reference mid-call
- Follow-up email drafts save 15-20 minutes per meeting
- Generous free tier (600 minutes/month)
- Mobile app works well for on-the-go review
Watch out
- Struggles with heavy accents and overlapping speech
- Action items miss nuanced or implied commitments
- Speaker labels occasionally misattribute in large meetings
- Less useful for brainstorming sessions with few concrete outcomes
- Summaries can feel generic for highly technical discussions
Use cases
- meeting notes
- action items
- follow-up emails