Delv
No Code Builderby Softgen4.3

Softgen

Build full-stack web apps from a brief. Real backend, real auth, real DB — exports working code, not a black box.

C
Safety & Trust

Delv Safety Grade: C

Score 54/100 · assessed 2026-04-18

Maintainer40
Permissions50
Supply chain45
Transparency35
Incidents100

Softgen is a closed-source autonomous agent that generates full-stack Next.js applications from natural language prompts. The service operates entirely through a web interface with no public repository, making supply chain verification impossible. Whilst the editorial review confirms it produces working code with real authentication and database schemas, the lack of transparency around how it generates code, what training data it uses, and whether it phones home is concerning. The maintainer appears to be a small commercial entity with minimal public presence. The agent requires significant permissions to generate functional apps (filesystem writes, database setup, authentication flows), but these are delivered as exported zip files rather than executed directly on your machine. No security incidents are known, but the closed nature and freemium model raise questions about data handling and code provenance. Suitable for prototyping but requires careful code review before production use.

Green flags

  • Generates exportable code rather than requiring runtime dependency
  • Editorial review confirms working auth and database implementations
  • Uses standard stack (Next.js, Supabase) rather than proprietary framework
  • No known security incidents or malicious behaviour reported

Red flags

  • No public repository or source code available for inspection
  • Closed-source autonomous agent with opaque code generation process
  • Unknown maintainer with minimal public track record
  • Unclear data handling policies for user prompts and generated code
  • Freemium model may incentivise data collection or lock-in

Permissions requested

Outbound networkExternal LLM callWrite filesDB writeIdentity write
Assessed by Delv Editorial using public metadata. Grades are advisory and update as the ecosystem changes. They do not replace your own review of permissions and code before granting an agent access to sensitive systems.

Pricing

FREEMIUM

Platforms

web

Review

Softgen sits in the awkward middle ground between Bolt.new and hiring a contractor. You describe a web app in plain English, it generates a full stack with Next.js, Supabase auth, and a working database schema. The autonomy here is real: it doesn't stop at a component or a mock-up. It builds routes, wires up authentication, seeds example data, and hands you a zip file you can actually deploy. I tested it with a simple SaaS idea: a waitlist tool with email verification and an admin dashboard. Softgen delivered in about four minutes. The code was clean enough, the auth flow worked, and the database migrations were sensible. Where it impressed me was the lack of hand-holding required. I didn't need to prompt-engineer my way through twenty iterations or manually stitch together API endpoints. It just built the thing. The failure modes are predictable. Complex business logic confuses it. I asked for a multi-tenant permissions system with role-based access, and it generated something that looked right but had gaping security holes. Custom integrations are a non-starter unless the API is extremely well-documented and popular. It also defaults to a very specific stack: Next.js, Supabase, Tailwind. If you need Django or Rails, you're out of luck. Compared to Bolt.new, Softgen is less conversational but more opinionated. Bolt lets you iterate in a chat interface and see live previews. Softgen gives you a finished artefact and expects you to take it from there. For solo founders who know enough code to debug but not enough to scaffold quickly, that trade-off works. For non-technical users, Bolt's hand-holding is probably safer. The freemium tier is generous: three full app builds per month. Paid plans unlock more builds and priority generation. The pricing makes sense if you're churning out client prototypes or internal tools. For a one-off MVP, the free tier is plenty. One concrete workflow: I used it to build a feedback widget for a client demo. Described the feature set in two paragraphs, exported the code, tweaked the styling, and deployed to Vercel in under an hour. That's the sweet spot: when you need something real, fast, and good enough to iterate on.
Verdict

Pay for this if you're a solo founder or agency shipping MVPs at speed and you're comfortable debugging generated code. Skip it if you need custom stacks, complex logic, or true no-code (you'll still need to read and edit what it builds).

Good at

  • Generates working full-stack apps, not just front-end demos
  • Real authentication and database schema out of the box
  • Fast: most builds complete in under five minutes
  • Generous free tier (three apps per month)
  • Exports clean, readable code you can actually deploy

Watch out

  • Locked to Next.js and Supabase, no stack flexibility
  • Struggles with complex business logic or custom integrations
  • Security-critical features need manual review
  • No iterative chat interface, just one-shot generation
  • Non-technical users will still need a developer to debug

Use cases

  • Solo founder MVPs
  • Internal tool builds without a dev
  • Client deliverables on tight deadlines
  • Rapid prototyping for design reviews