Delv
Rayyan
AI ResearchFreemium

Rayyan

AI-powered platform for systematic literature review screening

4.3rating
9.7Kviews
Learn
AI ResearchLiterature ReviewAcademic

About Rayyan

Rayyan is an AI-powered platform that takes the pain out of systematic literature review screening. As someone who has waded through the swamp of countless academic papers, I can confidently say that Rayyan is a breath of fresh air. It tackles the screening phase by using text mining and pattern recognition to help researchers quickly identify relevant studies. Imagine you're drowning in a sea of articles; Rayyan throws you a lifebuoy and helps you grab the ones that actually matter. The collaborative features are particularly noteworthy, allowing multiple team members to work together in real time. I found it refreshing to see team discussions integrated into the platform, making the process feel less like a solo slog and more like a team effort.

One thing that stands out about Rayyan is its user-friendly interface. Even if you’re not a seasoned researcher, you can navigate it without feeling like you need a PhD just to figure out how to upload your papers. The platform allows you to import citations from various databases like PubMed and Cochrane, which saves time and effort. Additionally, the automated citation sharing means you don’t have to constantly email PDFs around like it’s 1999. However, I did find the free tier somewhat limited in terms of advanced features, which can be a bummer if you’re looking for a comprehensive suite without shelling out cash.

Pricing is another aspect worth discussing. Rayyan operates on a freemium model, which means you can use the basic functionalities for free, but if you want access to more advanced tools and features, you’ll have to pay. This can be a sticking point for independent researchers or those in academia where budgets are tight. It’s a shame because the platform has the potential to save so much time; it feels almost criminal to have to pay for those extra features when the free version does a decent job.

In terms of who should use Rayyan, it’s particularly well-suited for researchers, academics, and students involved in systematic reviews. However, if you’re someone who prefers a more hands-on approach and enjoys the nitty-gritty of manual filtering, you might find Rayyan’s automation a bit too impersonal. Conversely, if you’re looking for a platform that can speed up your research process without sacrificing accuracy, Rayyan is definitely worth your time. Just be prepared to explore its premium options if you want to unlock its full potential.

Our Review

Verified 11 May 2026

Reviewed by Delv Editorial, Delv Team

When I first came across Rayyan, I was sceptical. I mean, how much easier could a platform really make the tedious task of screening literature for systematic reviews? After testing it out, I can honestly say that it’s a breath of fresh air. The AI-driven features allow for rapid identification of relevant studies, and the collaborative tools mean you can discuss your findings with your team without the hassle of endless emails. For someone like me, who has often felt buried under a pile of research papers, Rayyan is like having a trusty assistant by my side.

One of the standout features is the ability to import citations directly from databases like PubMed. I was amazed at how much time this saved me; no more copying and pasting references. Plus, the real-time chat feature for team discussions is fantastic, making it feel more like a collaborative effort and less like a solitary slog through research hell. I even found myself excited to sift through papers, which is a strange feeling for someone who typically dreads the process.

However, it’s not all sunshine and rainbows. The free tier does feel a bit limited; if you want access to more advanced features, you’ll need to fork out some cash. For independent researchers or students working on a budget, this could be a significant downside. Additionally, while the AI does a decent job of suggesting relevant articles, it’s not infallible. I found myself double-checking its recommendations more often than I’d like.

In comparison to competitors like Covidence, Rayyan excels in its user-friendly interface and collaborative features. Covidence offers more comprehensive data extraction tools but feels less approachable for newcomers. If you’re someone who thrives on teamwork and wants to speed up your literature review process, Rayyan is definitely worth exploring.

In terms of pricing, the freemium model is a double-edged sword. It’s great for those who want to dip their toes in without committing financially, but the advanced features are behind a paywall. Still, for anyone knee-deep in academia, Rayyan is a must-try. Overall, I found it to be a valuable tool that can genuinely make the process of systematic literature reviews less painful. Just be prepared to invest a little if you want to unlock its full potential.

Getting started with Rayyan

In this guide, you'll learn how to set up your Rayyan account and conduct your first systematic literature review screening. By the end, you'll be able to efficiently identify relevant studies from a large pool of academic papers.

Step 1: Sign up and set up

  • Go to [Rayyan's website](https://www.rayyan.ai).
  • Click on the **Sign up** button in the top right corner.
  • Enter your email address and create a password, or sign up using your Google account by clicking the **Sign in with Google** button.
  • Confirm your email address through the link sent to your inbox.
  • Once logged in, you’ll be taken to your dashboard, where you can create your first project.
  • Step 2: Your first literature review screening

  • On your dashboard, click the **Create a new review** button.
  • Name your review and add a description if desired, then click **Create**.
  • In the new review screen, click **Add references**.
  • Upload a file containing your references (e.g., a CSV or RIS file) or use the **Import from PubMed** option to pull in studies directly.
  • Once your references are loaded, click on **Screen** next to each article to start reviewing.
  • Use the **Include** and **Exclude** buttons to sort through the papers. Rayyan will highlight articles that match your criteria based on your previous decisions.
  • Step 3: Get better results

  • Use the **Filters** on the left to narrow down your articles by inclusion/exclusion criteria, such as keywords or year of publication.
  • Take advantage of the **Tags** feature to label articles for easy retrieval later. Click on **Tags** to create and apply them as you screen.
  • Regularly check the **Recommendations** feature for suggestions based on your screening patterns.
  • Pro tip

    Use the Collaborate feature to invite team members to your review. Click on the Invite button in your review dashboard to add collaborators. This can speed up the screening process significantly.

    Common mistake to avoid

    Avoid uploading references in unsupported formats. Ensure that your reference list is in a compatible format like CSV or RIS before uploading, as unsupported formats may cause errors and slow down your progress.

    The Verdict

    Rayyan is a solid choice for researchers and academics looking to simplify their systematic literature review process. If you thrive on collaboration and want to speed up your research without losing accuracy, this tool is for you. However, if you prefer manual methods or are on a tight budget, you might want to explore free alternatives.

    Best For

    • Academics conducting systematic reviews
    • Research teams needing collaborative tools
    • Students writing theses or dissertations
    • Independent researchers looking for efficiency
    • Grant writers compiling literature reviews

    At a Glance

    Rayyan is an AI-driven platform designed to simplify systematic literature review screening, making it easier for researchers to identify relevant studies quickly. Its collaborative features and user-friendly interface enhance the research workflow, though the freemium model may limit access to advanced tools for some users.

    Strengths

    • +The collaborative features make teamwork a breeze - you can chat with colleagues in real time, so you’re all on the same page without endless email chains.
    • +The user-friendly interface is a game changer; even if you're new to systematic reviews, you won't feel overwhelmed navigating the platform.
    • +Importing citations from databases like PubMed is simple and saves a ton of time compared to manual entry.
    • +The automated citation sharing feature reduces the hassle of distributing papers among team members, keeping everyone informed without the clutter of constant emails.
    • +The AI-driven text mining helps to quickly identify relevant studies, saving researchers hours that would otherwise be spent sifting through articles.
    • +The freemium model allows users to get a feel for the platform without any financial commitment, which is great for students or early-career researchers.

    Limitations

    • -The free version feels a bit basic; if you want advanced features, you’ll have to pay, which can be a downside for those on a tight budget.
    • -The AI’s decision-making isn't always perfect; occasionally, it may flag articles that aren't relevant, requiring you to double-check its suggestions.
    • -Some users may find the automation a bit impersonal, missing the satisfaction of manually sorting through papers.
    • -The platform's learning curve is present, and while it’s not steep, some features may require a bit of time to fully understand.
    • -There's a lack of offline functionality, which could be a dealbreaker if you want to work in environments with limited internet access.

    Use Cases

    • -Academics conducting systematic reviews who need to quickly filter through thousands of articles to find the most relevant studies.
    • -Research teams collaborating on literature reviews that require real-time communication and decision-making on included studies.
    • -Students tasked with conducting systematic reviews for their theses or dissertations who need a user-friendly platform to aid their research.
    • -Independent researchers who want to save time and effort in the screening process without getting bogged down by manual sorting.
    • -Grant writers who need to compile comprehensive literature reviews quickly to support their funding proposals.

    Alternatives

    Covidence - better suited for users who need extensive data extraction features and a more comprehensive workflow management.
    EndNote - ideal for those who want more advanced citation management tools alongside literature review functionalities.
    Mendeley - offers robust reference management and collaboration features, making it a solid choice for teams working on multiple projects.
    Zotero - a free tool that excels in reference management but may not have the same systematic review features as Rayyan.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Rayyan is an AI-driven platform designed to simplify systematic literature review screening, making it easier for researchers to identify relevant studies quickly. Its collaborative features and user-friendly interface enhance the research workflow, though the freemium model may limit access to advanced tools for some users.
    The key advantages of Rayyan include: The collaborative features make teamwork a breeze - you can chat with colleagues in real time, so you’re all on the same page without endless email chains.. The user-friendly interface is a game changer; even if you're new to systematic reviews, you won't feel overwhelmed navigating the platform.. Importing citations from databases like PubMed is simple and saves a ton of time compared to manual entry.. The automated citation sharing feature reduces the hassle of distributing papers among team members, keeping everyone informed without the clutter of constant emails.. The AI-driven text mining helps to quickly identify relevant studies, saving researchers hours that would otherwise be spent sifting through articles.. The freemium model allows users to get a feel for the platform without any financial commitment, which is great for students or early-career researchers..
    Some limitations of Rayyan include: The free version feels a bit basic; if you want advanced features, you’ll have to pay, which can be a downside for those on a tight budget.. The AI’s decision-making isn't always perfect; occasionally, it may flag articles that aren't relevant, requiring you to double-check its suggestions.. Some users may find the automation a bit impersonal, missing the satisfaction of manually sorting through papers.. The platform's learning curve is present, and while it’s not steep, some features may require a bit of time to fully understand.. There's a lack of offline functionality, which could be a dealbreaker if you want to work in environments with limited internet access..

    Pricing & Availability

    Freemium

    Reviews

    Team Notes

    No notes yet — be the first to share your experience!

    Alternatives to Rayyan

    View all

    Related

    More from AI Research